Dates off by 1 century.
Date fields list dates in the early 20th century instead of the 21st.
Our custom date field "Exit QA Date" is currently showing me that one release is slated for 1/11/1910 and the prior one is slated for 12/16/1909.
Don't know how it should be working, but those are all off by 100 years.
Our custom date field "Exit QA Date" is currently showing me that one release is slated for 1/11/1910 and the prior one is slated for 12/16/1909.
Don't know how it should be working, but those are all off by 100 years.
1
person has this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
-
Inappropriate?That's not how it should be working! I haven't confirmed it yet but I'll get a fix out ASAP once I can reproduce it. Thanks for the report.
-
Inappropriate?If you can't, I'll grab a screenshot. The app was the latest on the next... website today, running on XP.
-
Thanks, a screenshot might be helpful in any case if you're up to it. -
Inappropriate?I'll have to get it from work tomorrow. The MacOS version displays two digit dates, so it doesn't have the problem.
-
Inappropriate?Yep, on OSX the dates are also 1910 (can check by changing date format in system preferences -> international)
-
Inappropriate?Hmm. How does Jira handle it? Does it use the Sun/Java +20/-80 from current model? That would work for us, at least.
-
Inappropriate?To be honest, I'm not sure what JIRA does. I'm pretty sure there is some simple thing I am overlooking here...
-
Inappropriate?Ok, after an argument with the developers of the library I'm using (grr), I've solved the issue. I think we may have problems in the year 2100 though :)
I'll upload a new build once I do some more testing. -
Inappropriate?Ok, I believe the problem has been fixed now. If you want, you can download the Windows version (other OSes not done yet) from here:
http://next.worklogassistant.com/stag...
Please let me know if you think this build solves the problem.
Thanks again for the report!
I’m happy
-
Inappropriate?fixed in 1432 on windows.
And the next generation of programmers can deal with the "year 2.1K" problems.
I’m amused
-
Inappropriate?If WLA is still being used in 2100, then I should be very happy!
Thanks for letting me know it was fixed for you.
I’m happy
-
Inappropriate?This fix has been released to the main build. Thanks for the report!
The company says
this answers the question
Loading Profile...




EMPLOYEE