pre-publish worklog consolidation
is it possible to consolidate pending worklogs at the time of publish so that if there's more than 1 for the same bug they get sent out as one e-mail instead of several?
5
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The company implemented this idea.
The best point from the company
-
Hi,
This feature has been included in the latest release. You can find the documentation here: http://worklogassistant.com/gettingst...
Please let me know if there are any questions or suggestions.
Thanks!
I’m happy
The company thinks
this is one of the best points
The best point from everyone
-
I was thinking something more along the lines of when you cilck 'publish worklogs' it goes through the list and if it sees you have time on multiple instances for the same bug it'll add up those times and send the total to the bug instead of all the different times. Not sure if this is the best course of action.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Yea! This is an awesome feature request!!! I can't believe I didn't think of it sooner?
-
I think you were busy thinking up many others! -
Inappropriate?Unfortunately, the JIRA server controls the emails. Additionally, the way JIRA worklogs work is that we must submit only one log per interval.
However, one idea that I have received before is that if you have multiple worklogs whose intervals only differ by a few minutes, then we can consolidate those into one worklog.
So if you had:
1:00 - 1:15 some bug
1:17 - 1:45 some bug
Then we would submit:
1:00-1:45 some bug
What do you think about that? -
Inappropriate?I think what you're saying is consolidating somehow before sending the logs.
I wonder if outlining out workflow would be helpful --- so here goes:
work on task A and send for review.
while A is in review start working on B get to a stopping point and send for review
repeat this process for X number of tasks all which have time accrued against them.
at the end of the day, task A has come back from review with some changes so we start working on those changes (all the while applying time to it).
I think what you're proposing is a good intermediate step, but if we worked on task A in the AM and didn't get back to it until the afternoon, we'd like all time to be logged as one "chunk"
yes, you could argue the point that we should submit the time as soon as we've hit "stop timer". That would be a more accurate representation of when our work was completed, but in our case (i don't know if we'd be considered a "standard" user or not), i'm not sure the proposed solution would get us much.
What do you think @emilio?
-
Inappropriate?I personally tend to bounce back and forth between tasks starting and stopping the log on different ones as I get to them so instead of sending a barrage of e-mails throughout the day I would rather do one big push at the end of the day. Of course, that ends up being a long list of e-mails that get sent at the end of the day instead.
-
Ok, I understand. I wonder if JIRA's email can be batched... That would reduce the amount of emails. -
Inappropriate?Yes, that is what I was saying. I think the problem is that since JIRA only allows the submission of one worklog at a time, we can only follow their rules.
What if there was an option to publish the logs automatically as they were created? Would that help accomplish the goal? I presume the goal is to let people know that you are working on the tickets. -
Inappropriate?I was thinking something more along the lines of when you cilck 'publish worklogs' it goes through the list and if it sees you have time on multiple instances for the same bug it'll add up those times and send the total to the bug instead of all the different times. Not sure if this is the best course of action.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Ok, assuming you have two intervals which you worked on it: 9-9:45am and 3-3:45pm, we could submit one worklog starting at 3pm for 1.5 hr. Would that be acceptable? -
sounds good to me :D -
The current plan is to have the worklog ENDING at 3:45 but beginning at 2:15. This way, the merged worklog ends at the time when the work was actually stopped. -
Inappropriate?I like both suggestions:
- auto-publish (as an option, and default to no)
- submit worklog at 3pm for 1.5 hr
-
Inappropriate?Ok, thanks for the ideas! I'll put them in the queue.
-
Inappropriate?Perhaps what would suit most applications would be an option to either combine only adjacent worklogs on the same issue, or combine all not-yet-published worklogs on the same issue (my case) so that only 1 email per issue will be sent by Jira. In the latter case, I like the idea to leave the final ending time intact and adjust the starting time, especially since it's the starting time too that can be adjusted manually during tracking.
-
Thanks for your comment, it helps to hear about your particular situation. -
Inappropriate?Hi there,
Both consolidating and rounding worklogs are implemented. You can configure the behaviour in the "Pending Worklogs" tab.
Please download from:
http://next.worklogassistant.com/down...
I'd very much appreciate feedback. I think I've got a good match between usability and convenience but you never know!
Thanks in advance. -
Inappropriate?I've worked with the new implementation for two days and I find it perfect! :-)
Thanks!
I’m thankful
-
Inappropriate?Hi,
This feature has been included in the latest release. You can find the documentation here: http://worklogassistant.com/gettingst...
Please let me know if there are any questions or suggestions.
Thanks!
I’m happy
The company thinks
this is one of the best points
Loading Profile...





EMPLOYEE
